Would that not be a property of a maximally jolly being? Therefore, Santa exists.Įvery year, Santa keeps two lists containing all the children of the world: one for “nice” children, one for “naughty” children. And thirdly, let us assume that it’s better to be jolly and spread joy as a real being in the real world rather than as a made-up fictional character. There’s nothing more jolly than that, right? Let us also assume that it’s theoretically possible for a maximally jolly being to exist.
#Tachiyomi j2k full
Just imagine his cherry-red nose, his twinkling eyes, his belly shaking like a bowl full of jelly. Let us assume that Santa is a maximally jolly being, the most jolly creature possible. I think it’s safer to bet on that option. That means you live in a wonderful world where a jolly man flies around and delivers free toys to all the boys and girls every year. What kind of horrible world is that? Now let’s say you’re a Santa believer, and it turns out you’re wrong. That means you’re in a world where grown-ups have to spend hundreds of dollars every Christmas, going through all kinds of stress, just to please their spoiled, thankless children. Let’s say you’re a Santa denier, and it turns out you’re wrong. Therefore, the first cause is Santa Claus. Every present must have a cause, and Santa is the only rational explanation I’ve heard that makes sense. You can’t just have a bunch of neatly wrapped gifts coming out of nothing.
Presents don’t just appear out of nowhere. No, the design is so complex and intricate that it must have been made by elves in Santa’s workshop. I looked up pictures of the PS5 I might be getting if I’m nice, and it looks so beautiful that it can’t possibly have been made in a factory. it's mostly bugfixes and a few small featuresġ5 arguments that PROVE Santa exists and DESTROY Santa deniersĮvery Christmas, a bunch of presents appear under my Christmas tree.
0 kommentar(er)
